Was adjusting some firewall rules and verifying them from the outside, and discovered that an unexpected port was being allowed, but only on the secondary WAN connection.
This particular setup uses dual WANs in a failover configuration, but has a ton of DNAT rules to allow inbound traffic on the secondary WAN because port-forward can only apply to one wan-interface. Here’s some relevant CLI:
set firewall group port-group web port 80
set firewall group port-group web port 443
set firewall group port-group web port 8080
set service nat rule 100 description wan2-web
set service nat rule 100 destination group address-group ADDRv4_eth7
set service nat rule 100 destination group port-group web
set service nat rule 100 inbound-interface eth7
set service nat rule 100 inside-address address 10.10.10.10
set service nat rule 100 inside-address port 8080
What I was seeing was that an inbound request to 443 was being allowed from anywhere, despite having firewall rules restricting access to certain IP ranges. Upon further examination I discovered that the request was being sent to 8080 on the inside.
And I immediately suspected my error: DNAT rules are processed before Firewall rules. Turning up logging on the FW and DNAT rules quickly confirmed that was the case.
Whoops.
My other mistake here is that I probably shouldn’t be using inside-address port in my DNAT rules. The guide I followed to originally configure these DNAT rules suggested that they were necessary, but that is not the case and translating port numbers is definitely not the behavior I was looking for.
